# Proof radiometric dating is wrong, assumption 1: conditions at time zero

We can explain many dates away, but a question creationists need to face is which Rogersville dating the best explanation of the data.

For this reason, this arrangement of minerals became known as Bowen's reaction series. In the Comte du Buffon tried to obtain a value for the age of Earth using an experiment: Assume D3, P3, and N3 in source 3, all zero.

We can use scientific techniques in the present, combined with assumptions about historical events, to estimate the age. This will cause an apparent large age. I now describe this mixing in more detail. When the isotope concentrations are adjusted for such conversions, the ages calculated are reduced from some Ma to recent.

## How the carbon clock works

The amount of radiogenic lead is measured by seeing how the lead in the rock differs in isotope composition from the lead around the rock. Let N p be the concentration of some non-radiogenic not generated by radioactive decay isotope of D at point p.

Once the rocks melt, a plume of molten material begins to rise in the crust. We have seen many ways in which radiometric dates can be affected by what is going on in the magma.

## Radiometric Dating Is Not Inaccurate

Anyway, to me it seems unlikely that this chain of events would occur. If the Flood of Noah occurred around BC, as some creationists claim, then all the bristlecone pines would have to be less than five thousand years old. If they did, all would give the same ages, you are right. So geologists have assumed these radioactive decay rates have been constant for billions of years.

Otherwise, Proof radiometric dating is wrong system is degenerate. Evidence for a rapid formation of geological strata, as in the biblical flood.

The bigger c1 is, the older the rock is.

## Search form

Of course, any process that tends to concentrate or deplete uranium or thorium relative to lead would have an influence on the radiometric ages computed by uranium-lead or thorium-lead dating.

We will deal with carbon dating first and then with the other dating methods. That is, the more daughter product relative to parent product, the greater the age. Therefore the process is: For example, zircons are thought to accept little lead but much uranium.

Historical science cannot be observed. It is possible that these physical processes have an impact on the determined radiometric age of the rock as it cools and crystallizes.